(San Bernardino, California) — October 22, 2026 — Wade Litigation attorney Xochitl Urena secured a significant courtroom victory after successfully defending a client against a domestic violence restraining order petition involving allegations of physical abuse, mental abuse, and financial coercive control.
The case presented particularly serious consequences for the client, who faced the potential loss of her employment if a permanent restraining order were issued.
Through strategic investigation, careful preparation, and effective courtroom advocacy, Urena successfully challenged the petitioner’s allegations and obtained a dismissal with prejudice.
Police Body-Camera Footage Becomes Critical Evidence
The dispute centered primarily on an alleged physical altercation that occurred in February 2026, during which law enforcement officers were called to the scene.
Recognizing the importance of obtaining objective evidence, Urena and the Wade Litigation team subpoenaed police records and body-camera footage from the incident.
The footage revealed significant contradictions between the petitioner’s account of the incident and what was captured by the responding officers’ cameras.
Rather than simply introducing the recordings during the defense’s presentation of evidence, Urena developed a strategy to use the footage to challenge the petitioner’s credibility during cross-examination.
Strategic Cross-Examination Leads to Dismissal
During the contested hearing before Judge Arthur Benner II, Urena confronted the petitioner with the police body-camera evidence.
The footage directly contradicted portions of the petitioner’s testimony, allowing Urena to challenge the reliability of the allegations underlying the requested restraining order.
The strategy proved successful.
At the conclusion of the petitioner’s case, Urena obtained a dismissal of the petition without having to present the defense’s own case.
Importantly, the Court dismissed the petition with prejudice, bringing the proceeding to a definitive conclusion in favor of Wade Litigation’s client.
The result was particularly significant because of the potential professional consequences the client faced had the requested restraining order been granted.
Effective Investigation and Trial Strategy Produce Favorable Result
The case illustrates the importance of thorough investigation and strategic use of evidence in contested litigation. By obtaining independent law enforcement recordings and using them to challenge the petitioner’s testimony, Urena successfully defended her client against serious allegations and obtained a favorable ruling without requiring the presentation of additional defense evidence.
About Wade Litigation
Wade Litigation, A Professional Corporation, is a California law firm representing individuals and businesses in civil litigation, business disputes, family law matters, probate and trust litigation, and appeals. The firm is committed to providing effective legal representation, strategic courtroom advocacy, and personalized service to clients throughout California.
Clients Throughout California
Fields Marked With An ”*” Are Required