Trusts are usually administered by a family member, and that is where most of the trouble starts. A sibling appointed trustee begins treating trust assets as their own, stops answering questions, and years pass without a distribution or an explanation.
Beneficiaries in that position often assume they have no recourse short of suing family. California law gives them considerably more than that, and the first steps do not require a lawsuit at all.
What a Trustee Actually Owes You
A trustee is a fiduciary, which is the highest duty the law imposes. It is not a matter of good intentions or family goodwill. It is a set of enforceable obligations.
- Loyalty — administering the trust solely in the interest of the beneficiaries, not their own
- Impartiality — treating beneficiaries even-handedly where there is more than one
- Avoiding conflicts of interest and self-dealing
- Keeping trust property separate from personal property
- Prudent investment and management of trust assets
- Keeping beneficiaries reasonably informed
- Providing an accounting on request and at required intervals
That last duty is the one beneficiaries most often do not realize they can enforce. A trustee is not entitled to administer in silence, and a refusal to account is itself a breach.
The Warning Signs
Certain patterns recur so consistently that they function as a checklist.
No accounting has been provided despite requests. Distributions have stopped without explanation. The trustee lives in trust-owned property rent-free. Trust funds have paid the trustee’s personal expenses. An asset was sold to the trustee, a relative, or a friend at a price nobody tested against the market. The trustee has taken compensation without disclosing the amount or basis. Communications go unanswered for months.
Individually, some of these have innocent explanations. Together they describe a trustee who has stopped distinguishing between the trust’s money and their own.
Start With a Demand for an Accounting
Before litigation, Wade Litigation generally begins with a written demand for a full accounting.
This does two things. It sometimes resolves the matter, because a trustee who has been careless rather than dishonest will produce records once the request is formal. And where it does not resolve matters, the refusal becomes evidence.
An accounting also converts suspicion into specifics. Once you can see the transactions, the conversation stops being about whether something feels wrong and becomes about identifiable transfers on identifiable dates.
Petitioning the Court
Where informal demands fail, a beneficiary may pursue probate litigation by petitioning the court regarding the trust’s internal affairs. That petition can seek a range of relief.
- An order compelling a full accounting
- Removal of the trustee and appointment of a successor
- Surcharge — a money judgment against the trustee personally for losses caused
- Return of trust property that was improperly transferred
- Denial or reduction of trustee compensation
- Suspension of the trustee’s powers while the matter is litigated
- Instructions where the trust’s terms are genuinely ambiguous
Suspension deserves particular attention where assets are actively being dissipated. A trustee selling property or moving funds while civil litigation proceeds can render a later judgment worthless, and interim relief exists precisely for that situation.
Grounds for Removal
Courts do not remove trustees for being unpleasant or slow. Removal generally requires a breach of trust, insolvency or unfitness, hostility that impairs administration, excessive compensation, or a failure or refusal to act.
Where the trustee is also a beneficiary — which is extremely common in family trusts — courts closely examine the conflict. A trustee who is deciding whether to distribute to themselves or to their siblings is in a structurally difficult position, and how they have handled it matters more than how they describe it.
Surcharge and Double Damages
Removal alone often does not make beneficiaries whole. Surcharge does. A trustee can be held personally liable for losses resulting from a breach, for profits they made, and for what the trust would have earned had it been managed properly.
California also provides for enhanced recovery when a person has, in bad faith, wrongfully taken, concealed, or disposed of property belonging to a trust or estate. In appropriate cases, the exposure goes beyond simply returning what was taken and paying attorney fees.
That provision changes the negotiating dynamic substantially. A trustee facing return of the asset alone has limited incentive to settle early. A trustee facing more than that has considerable incentive.
Trusts That Will Not Distribute
The most frequent complaint beneficiaries raise is not theft. It is a trustee who simply will not distribute anything.
Where a trust directs outright distribution after the settlor’s death, a trustee has a reasonable period to marshal assets, pay debts and taxes, and then distribute. Years of delay without explanation are not administration; they are a breach.
Discretionary trusts are harder. Where the trustee has discretion over distributions, courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment. But discretion is not unlimited — it must be exercised in good faith, in accordance with the trust’s purposes, and not arbitrarily. A trustee who refuses every request without considering any of them has abused discretion rather than exercised it.
Partial distributions are also available. Where a trust cannot be closed due to an unresolved issue, a court may order a preliminary distribution of assets unaffected by that issue.
Time Limits
Claims for breach of trust are subject to time limits, and the clock can be set in motion by the trustee’s own disclosure. Where a beneficiary receives an account or report that adequately discloses a potential claim, a relatively short period may run from the date of receipt.
This produces a trap. A beneficiary who receives an accounting, does not understand it, and files it away may lose claims that the document disclosed. If you receive an accounting and something looks wrong, have it reviewed rather than shelved.
Trustee Compensation and Attorney Fees
A trustee is entitled to reasonable compensation unless the trust provides otherwise, but “reasonable” is a standard a court can review.
Disputes arise when a trustee has paid themselves without disclosure, without records of time spent, or at a rate unrelated to the work performed. A trustee who cannot document what they did for the money is in a poor position to defend it.
Trustees also commonly hire counsel and pay from trust funds. Where the legal work benefits the trust, that is generally proper. Where the trustee is defending their own misconduct, it is not, and a court can order those fees repaid personally.
Beneficiaries who see substantial legal fees flowing out of the trust while their own questions go unanswered are usually looking at a trustee funding a defense with the beneficiaries’ money.
The Successor Trustee Problem
Removing a trustee raises an immediate practical question: who takes over?
The trust document usually names a successor. Where the named successor is another family member aligned with the removed trustee, that may simply relocate the problem. Where no successor is named or willing, the court can appoint one.
A professional fiduciary is often the right answer in a family where trust has completely broken down. It costs more than having a family member serve without compensation, but a properly administered trust with a paid professional is often cheaper than years of litigation between siblings.
Practical Advice for Beneficiaries
Put requests in writing and keep copies. Verbal requests that go unanswered are difficult to prove later. Be specific about what you are asking for and set a reasonable deadline.
Gather what you can independently — property records showing transfers, the original trust document and any amendments, and whatever financial information you already hold.
Avoid escalating the family conflict beyond the legal issue. These cases are difficult enough on the facts, and courts are unimpressed by beneficiaries who appear to be litigating a grievance rather than a breach.
If you are a beneficiary being kept in the dark, or a trustee facing allegations you believe are unfounded, a Los Angeles probate attorney can assess the dispute and the remedies available. Both sides of these disputes benefit from an early, realistic assessment.
Clients Throughout California
Fields Marked With An ”*” Are Required